Menu ⇓
  • Top ⇑
  • Barnaby Walters
  • Notes
  • Articles
  • Music
  • Places
  • ABCPig
 
  1. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Micah N Gorrell

    @BarnabyWalters Those would work as well but would limit it's use to an actual browser. What is wrong with an HTTP header for this?
    16th of February 2014 at 16:29
  2. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Micah N Gorrell

    @BarnabyWalters I don't see much point in human checking. Machine-only use, with clear indication of the results seems much more useful.
    16th of February 2014 at 16:28
  3. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Sérgio Ramos

    retweeted this.
    16th of February 2014 at 16:09
  4. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Philippe Gamache

    retweeted this.
    16th of February 2014 at 16:09
  5. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Luís Nabais

    retweeted this.
    16th of February 2014 at 16:09
  6. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Micah N Gorrell

    @BarnabyWalters It should be an HTTP header, so that existing clients aren't broken by the change.
    16th of February 2014 at 16:08
  7. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Barnaby Walters

    @justincormack @janl possibly, human-visible links/keys less likely to go out of date, also better BC… waterpigs.co.uk/notes/4UcFaN/
    16th of February 2014 at 15:46
  8. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Justin Cormack

    @janl @BarnabyWalters sure, it needs extending but I think http headers are the right place for this.
    16th of February 2014 at 15:29
  9. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Jan Lehnardt

    @justincormack @BarnabyWalters md5 ain’t no gpg-verify :)
    16th of February 2014 at 15:28
  10. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Justin Cormack

    @BarnabyWalters @janl there is already the Content-MD5 http header for that (although should be sha). Eg Amazon s3 can use to verify upload.
    16th of February 2014 at 15:27
  11. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Tobias T—

    retweeted this.
    16th of February 2014 at 15:05
  12. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Jan Lehnardt

    retweeted this.
    16th of February 2014 at 15:05
  13. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Romain

    retweeted this.
    16th of February 2014 at 15:05
  14. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Joschi Kuphal 吉

    .@BarnabyWalters Great idea!
    16th of February 2014 at 12:57
  15. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Sophie Dennis

    @BarnabyWalters I mistook part of the handwritten notes for "disco" - an extreme example of varying tune for different dance types :)
    15th of February 2014 at 11:57
  16. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Aitor García Rey

    @BarnabyWalters Are you in UK?
    7th of February 2014 at 23:50
  17. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Barnaby Walters

    @_aitor “apps/repositories” not specific or user-focused enough to base improvements/requirements on … waterpigs.co.uk/notes/4USFX0/
    5th of February 2014 at 15:45
  18. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Aitor García Rey

    @BarnabyWalters Base format to describe a recipe (not only in html contexts) as source for apps and recipe repositories.
    5th of February 2014 at 15:44
  19. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Aitor García Rey

    @BarnabyWalters Potentially all the use cases you mention. Open enough for users (devs) to query them in different ways, enabling dif UIs.
    5th of February 2014 at 15:43
  20. In reply to a post on waterpigs.co.uk

    Aitor García Rey

    @BarnabyWalters First specific use case is an app to discover food seasonality (cf. twitter.com/_aitor/status/…)
    5th of February 2014 at 15:42
  • ← Older
  • Newer →
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License This site is built from Taproot.
← An IndieWeb Webring 🕸💍 →